It was a breeze getting set up, which was arguably the most arduous thought at starting our business endeavor. As our needs grew, our back-end software grew, and our company grew. Juniper grew with us and -- quite literally -- kept us going as we started our journey.

We had some small downtime re: our router services, but it was during out-of-season windows for us (per our requests) and normally during non-business hours. While not truly a complaint as this was to be expected, they circumvented our down time by doing this during times in which we didn't expect to see any traffic.

As a public company with many public faces, Juniper kept us safe on the backend, safe from virtually any kind of potential attack on all of our platforms -- quite literally getting us going and keeping us going in the early stages.

switching and routing, failover is too good option

SRX interface is not much user friendly, and load balancer is not available

User Friendly Interface with load balancing and using loging atleast 6 months with dashboards in single hardware/buddle

failover and routing switches between different network.subnets

The devices contain enough firepower and features within a box.

The costing, as Cisco they can also charge subscription based but up front cost does hamper the products

There are gateway related SRX devices that we used and multi security box concept.

Juniper SRX1500 helps me to suppress DDOS attacks targeting our office. Without comprising its performance, Juniper SRX 1500 blocks all DDOS traffics that is targetting the victim IP addresses.

There is no capability to detect malicious/DDOS traffic in Juniper SRX. We need to observe it manually to check whether the traffic is legitimate or not. If Juniper SRX can see it early, we can respond to the threat earlier.

Since Juniper SRX 1500 helps me suppress the DDOS traffic, we do not experience any service outage.

The ease of use. You cannot go wrong in juniper with commit option. Moreover you can roll back if something does not fit. The data/ security flow is clear enough to make changes to best suited to your environment.

Perhaps the granularity of security is missing . Various settings are available but not availed in a single panel. Things can be made better by improving the gui response as currently all firewalls give gui.

I have protected my network using utm features and ips/ ids. App secure features like app track are continuously being employed for behaviour monitoring. The business performance has soared to new levels.

Juniper is far better in providing overall network solutions. Overall star performance.

Software patch upgrade documentation need to be improved including the common errors. This will help in troubleshooting further.

Currently exploring Juniper ATP

Best part about Juniper Security are easy to handle via cli and Gui. Products are easy to configure for the beginners also as per required through the help of documents

Need to ingregate the product with other oem is not easy and some time device troubleshoot at packet level is not easy

Please get hands on juniper via its pretty cool and easy

Report generation and intergation with Junos Space Security Director

Juniper is a pioneer and world leading OEM in Networking products. It also has tried hands in Security Portfolio. However, it would continue to be called leading in Networking equipments. They have nice portfolio in routing. Juniper has really good OS & CLI which really makes the user or operator's task easy. People in Network operator community like Juniper CLI. The GUI is not that intuitive though manageable.

Juniper is a leading OEM in Networking equipments and large scale routers, datacenter switching platforms & Access and aggregation routers. They are not even close to leading OEMs in security like Palo Alto, Checkpoint, Fortinet, etc. Security is not a focus for the company. It is recommended to evaluate alternate solutions with leaders in this solution space. Infact, there have been no clear communication on company's roadmap about their security business focus.

Security is just managing to meet the requirement, however they are far behind the Top 10-15 security solutions provider. There have never been a clear roadmap and business vision to develop themselves as a Security leader. It is recommended to evaluate alternate solutions with leaders in this solution space.

Security is just managing to meet the requirement, however they are far behind the Top 10-15 security solutions provider. There have never been a clear roadmap and business vision to develop themselves as a Security leader. It is recommended to evaluate alternate solutions with leaders in this solution space. Juniper has really good OS & CLI which really makes the user or operator's task easy. People in Network operator community like Juniper CLI. The GUI is not that intuitive though manageable.

It makes access more secure and connection are more trusted when using it. The setup is quick and doesnt require much input from the end users

the setup generally stops at some point and there is no reason for the failure. The popup windows while setup sometimes does not show up making it difficult to identify why setup is not working.

easy to use and it solves the purpose if you are setting up a remote ODC

to have secure connection to the client network. It makes the users more accountable of what network they are using. Also, it is easy to track and monitor the users.